While I’ve identified the main beats of each episode, I
still have to analyze how storylines are introduced and interwoven. The best I can say is that Scandal follows screenwriting best
practices: get in late, get out early.
Hence, we jump right into the season pilot with a problem,
foregoing background exposition other than “gladiators in suits” and Olivia
Pope wears the white hat, which is immediately exemplified by Olivia solving one
problem and moving right on to the next. Like all good movies, you start with an ending. And while Olivia and her team of
gladiators, to whom we are given perfunctory introductions, work on one
problem, the real problem, which will develop into the murder mystery thread for the next six
episodes, arises 20 minutes into the show. From this we derive twists and subplots that are riveting
and surprising and cause this analyst to ask which came first, the chicken or
the egg? Did Shonda Rhimes know in
advance what she was going to do in seasons two and three and build those
elements into the first season, or did she build in enough ideas from which
could arise any number of variables for subsequent seasons?
Not providing characters with back story is a deliberate
ploy on the part of television writers because it gives them the freedom to suddenly
introduce grandma out of the woodpile, or in this case a mother who died in a
plane crash. Oh wait, she’s not
dead, she’s been imprisoned for twenty years!
While we meet our main cast in the Pilot, we are introduced
to a new character each episode.
In episode two, it’s Billy; in episode three, it’s Gideon; episode four,
James; five, Charlie; six, Sally.
This technique spoon feeds viewers and gives them time to assimilate
each new character and their role in the story. And then, finally, in the penultimate show of the season we
get the backstory on how our central characters came together, their raison d'etre. Just think, if this had all been laid our linearly how bored
our TV viewing audience would be.
The other technique that precludes audience confusion is the
clever casting of physically diverse characters and the unique voice that each
is given. An old screenwriting
lesson used Unforgiven (written by
none other than the great David Webb Peoples) as an example. The lesson was: if you close your
eyes, you can still identify which cowboy is talking by his speech
pattern. Close your eyes and you
cannot confuse any female character in Scandal with another, nor male character with
another. Though they deliver
equally brilliant speeches, Cyrus and David are distinctly different right down
to the vocabulary they use. Fitz
has a habit of repeating himself, especially when he’s talking to Olivia. For example, he doesn’t say, “I love
you,” once, but three times. He
doesn’t say, “You know me,” once, but three times. He doesn’t say, “Say my name,” once, but three times. Huck has his stock phrases. Harrison is our smooth legal talker, Stephen our womanizer, Abbey our bitch with a heart, and
Quinn is our quivering, eager-to-please, fish out of a barrel, mess.
On the subject of Quinn, she is our one character who will
undergo a character arc. I find
this interesting as she was the first character we opened on in the Pilot, the
only one to have developed a personal life, and the only one who will undergo a
radical change.
No comments:
Post a Comment